![]() ![]() The mice used as controls in that study actually had a below-average rate of cancer, Stanhope said, making the aspartame-eating mice seem worse off. "Compared to sugar, this has less effect on body weight and mortality risk," he said, and it's "almost certainly better than sugar."Īspartame got a bad reputation decades ago from a controversial mouse study that showed an increase in cancer among the animals that consumed a lot of the sweetener, said Kimber Stanhope, a research nutritional biologist at the University of California, Davis. Walter Willett, a nutrition researcher at the Harvard T.H. Sold under brand names NutraSweet and EqualĪspartame has been the leading alternative sweetener since the early 1980s, so it's been the subject of the most research, said Dr.IN DETAIL: Why research can't quite say whether sugar substitutes are healthyĪt this point, it's hard to distinguish among sweeteners in terms of their health effects, because there hasn't been enough research. Here's what research says about some of the most common ones: Aspartame Erythritol is better for baking than many others because its level of sweetness is close to sugar's other sweeteners are much more intense and can only be used in small quantities. Some people can't tolerate the aftertaste of certain sweeteners. Which sugar substitute is best? The answer isn't obvious. The food industry adds dozens of different sugar substitutes to processed foods to make them sweeter. Each has a different chemical structure, intensity and impact on the human body. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |